The 1975’s O2 Arena Concerts to Feature Pioneering Carbon-Removed Shows

In a groundbreaking move, The 1975 is set to perform at the O2 Arena in London next year, and these concerts are being promoted as the venue’s first-ever “carbon-removed” shows. The four sold-out dates, scheduled for February and March, are part of the band’s European tour, featuring Matty Healy and friends. This initiative reflects The 1975’s ongoing commitment to climate awareness, as showcased by their 2020 album, “Notes on a Conditional Form,” featuring activist Greta Thunberg on the opening track.

AEG Europe, the organizers behind this endeavor, claim that the O2’s pilot scheme will mark a world-first for the music event industry. Their approach involves calculating the carbon emissions generated by hosting the shows, catering, the band’s travel, and even the emissions produced by fans traveling to the concerts – a significant contributor, as research suggests. The objective is to neutralize this carbon footprint, effectively removing an estimated 100 tonnes of carbon dioxide (CO2) per show from the atmosphere.

It’s essential to clarify that “carbon removal” refers to the process of extracting CO2 from the atmosphere. This can be achieved through various methods, such as technological solutions or natural systems like afforestation. However, it’s important to note that the actual carbon removal process won’t occur at the concert but will be managed by a startup named CUR8. They employ a combination of techniques, including tree-planting and direct air capture, to offset an equivalent amount of carbon emissions.

While the concept of carbon removal has its critics, who argue that it might create a false sense of security and divert focus from emissions reduction efforts, certain scientific organizations, including those advising the United Nations, see merit in this technique, particularly in challenging sectors like agriculture and long-distance transportation.

Sam Booth, AEG’s sustainability head, acknowledges that there is still much work to be done, but views The 1975’s concerts as an opportunity to ignite conversations about climate responsibility. He emphasizes that the O2 is actively working to reduce emissions associated with major aspects such as heating and powering the venue. The O2 is already powered by renewable energy and has excluded beef from its concession stands due to its high carbon footprint. However, Sam underscores that a multifaceted approach is necessary, with emissions reduction and carbon removal working hand in hand.

Although “net zero” and “carbon removal” sound similar, they are distinct concepts. Sam clarifies that “net zero” involves reducing one’s carbon footprint by 90% and subsequently eliminating the remaining 10%. Achieving a perfect “net zero” event on a large scale remains a challenge.

Christopher Johnson, a sustainability consultant advising the UK event, festival, and music industries, views the O2’s pilot as a positive development. He sees carbon removal as a second step following emissions reduction efforts. The O2 has already taken pioneering steps to lower carbon emissions from its events. Christopher believes that the high-profile nature of The 1975’s participation in this pilot is key in conveying the importance of carbon emissions to audiences and the industry.

Leo Mercer, a policy analyst at the Grantham Institute at the London School of Economics, speculates that AEG may have chosen carbon removal for “marketing” reasons, as it is less contentious than carbon offsets. Carbon offsetting seeks to balance emissions by identifying alternative methods to reduce carbon in the atmosphere by an equivalent amount. However, carbon offsetting doesn’t necessarily entail the physical removal of carbon. Leo argues that carbon removal processes are more likely to result in lasting CO2 reductions and are especially feasible for the live music industry compared to sectors like heavy industry and agriculture.

AEG reveals that if the O2 pilot proves successful, they intend to introduce carbon removal practices at their venues and tours globally. This might result in a minor cost for fans, as evidenced by the 90p contribution from the ticket price for the O2 shows. CUR8, the startup responsible for the carbon removal, has also engaged in discussions with other musical acts about incorporating carbon removal in their events.

The O2’s innovative approach reflects the growing emphasis on climate responsibility in the entertainment industry. While carbon removal is seen as a promising development, experts and stakeholders stress that it should complement, not detract from, immediate actions to reduce emissions. The journey towards sustainability is gaining momentum, and the role of live events and venues in inspiring change is becoming increasingly significant.