Federal Judge Denies Stay on Alabama’s Ban on Gender-Affirming Care for Minors

In a recent development, a federal judge has denied a request from the U.S. Department of Justice to pause litigation challenging Alabama’s ban on gender-affirming care for minors. This decision comes as similar cases are moving towards the U.S. Supreme Court. The Justice Department had requested a stay, stating that the “exceptional legal landscape is quickly evolving.”

U.S. District Judge Liles Burke rejected the request, stating that the case will move forward for now. However, he added that a stay might be appropriate later if related petitions are granted. The case is scheduled to go to trial in April.

Transgender young people and their families have asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review an appellate court decision that allowed bans in Kentucky and Tennessee to remain in effect. In the Alabama case, families with transgender children have requested the full 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to review a decision that would let the Alabama law take effect.

At least 22 states have enacted laws banning or restricting gender-affirming care for minors, with most of these bans being challenged in court. The Alabama ban makes it a felony, punishable by up to 10 years in prison, for doctors to treat people under 19 with puberty blockers or hormones to help affirm a new gender identity. The law remains blocked by an injunction until the 11th Circuit appeals court issues a mandate in the case.

This ongoing legal battle highlights the ongoing debate surrounding transgender rights and access to healthcare. As the cases continue to make their way through the courts, it remains to be seen how the U.S. Supreme Court will ultimately rule on these issues.