Big Tech’s Role in the Online Child Sexual Exploitation Crisis: A Deep Dive into the Hearing at the US Senate Judiciary Committee
3 min readThe recent hearing at the US Senate Judiciary Committee, titled “Big Tech and the Online Child Sexual Exploitation Crisis,” brought together the CEOs of Meta, TikTok, X, Snap, and Discord to discuss the responsibility and liability of their platforms in hosting harmful content that specifically targets or exploits minors. The hearing was a significant step towards addressing the issue of online child sexual exploitation and the role that Big Tech plays in it.
The audience at the hearing was filled with family members who had lost loved ones due to harms inflicted by social media platforms. These families had suffered the loss of their children after they unknowingly bought fentanyl off social media or were victims of eating disorders, self-harm, and suicide due to harmful social media content. The families’ presence served as a stark reminder of the real-life consequences of the issue at hand.
Senators from both parties emphasized the need for congress to pass laws that would lift the liability shields of the companies and hold them accountable for the harmful content on their platforms. The CEOs were grilled on their responsibility towards users and the measures they have taken to protect them.
One of the most notable moments of the hearing was when Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., pressed Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta, on the responsibility of his platforms in affecting users. Internal Meta studies showed that high percentages of young girls were exposed to unwanted nudity, sexual advances, and self-harm content in just one week. Hawley asked Zuckerberg if he had apologized to the victims and their families. Zuckerberg, after some hesitation, apologized to the families in the audience. He also acknowledged that his company would continue investing in efforts to protect users.
The Judiciary Committee has already passed several bills aimed at placing more safeguards on social media applications. These bills include the ability to opt-out of algorithms geared toward addicting users and expanding the federal civil cause of action for child victims to sue the platforms that promoted or facilitated exploitation. However, the CEOs were pressed on why their companies wouldn’t fully support these measures.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., expressed his concern over the lack of regulatory body dealing with the most profitable companies in history, which cannot be sued and have no meaningful laws to protect consumers. He also highlighted the need for Congress to pass laws that would hold Big Tech accountable for the harms caused to users, particularly minors.
The hearing revealed an astounding lack of true remorse from tech CEOs for the children who have been traumatized and have even died as a result of their inherently dangerous platforms. Lina Nealon, vice president at the National Center on Sexual Exploitation, emphasized the need to rein in Big Tech’s content censorship and the importance of addressing the harm Section 230, tech’s current liability shield, has enabled.
The bills that could potentially bring about change include the EARN IT Act, STOP CSAM Act, Preventing Child Sex Abuse Act, the Kids Online Safety Act, Project Safe Childhood Act, REPORT Act, and the Child Safety Modernization Act. These bills aim to hold Big Tech accountable for the harms caused to users, particularly minors, and to provide more safeguards for children online.
In conclusion, the hearing at the US Senate Judiciary Committee served as a significant step towards addressing the issue of online child sexual exploitation and the role that Big Tech plays in it. The families’ presence served as a reminder of the real-life consequences of the issue, and the need for congress to pass laws that would hold Big Tech accountable for the harmful content on their platforms. The CEOs’ lack of true remorse for the harms caused to children was evident, and the need for change is clear. The bills mentioned in the hearing offer a potential solution to this issue, and it is crucial that Congress takes action to protect children online.