Former Vice President Mike Pence’s Advocacy Group Urges US Withdrawal from WHO Pandemic Treaty
13 min readThe World Health Organization (WHO) has been a subject of controversy in recent times, with former Vice President Mike Pence’s advocacy group, Advancing American Freedom (AAF), calling for the United States to withdraw from the international body. The AAF’s letter, published on January 23, 2024, criticizes the WHO’s proposed pandemic treaty, accusing it of being an act of ‘equity theater’ that undermines US sovereignty in the case of another pandemic.
The WHO, an agency of the United Nations, has been under scrutiny for its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly its response to the origins of the virus. The organization has been accused of being too close to China, which has been criticized for its transparency regarding the pandemic’s origins. The AAF’s letter adds to the growing criticism of the WHO and its proposed pandemic treaty.
The proposed treaty, according to the AAF, emphasizes race and ‘equity’ before almost every other value, using the word ‘equity’ at least 9 times and ‘equitable’ at least 20 times. It presents ‘equity’ as its third general principle, ahead of responsibility, transparency, accountability, and science and evidence. The AAF argues that this prioritization of ‘equity’ over other values is untenable and raises serious questions about America’s independence of action and ability to respond to global pandemics.
The treaty also contains articles related to freedom of expression, with one article specifically calling on signing nations to ‘combat false, misleading, misinformation or disinformation, including through effective international collaboration and cooperation.’ The AAF warns that this could be used to suppress free speech and undermine democratic values.
Furthermore, the treaty would give the WHO control of international supply chains in the event of another pandemic event, intended to allow more efficient manipulation of resources. The AAF argues that this would be a dangerous concentration of power and a threat to US sovereignty.
The AAF’s letter comes as the WHO Director-General, Tedros Ghebreyesus, has called on countries to sign the pandemic treaty by May 2024, when the World Health Assembly is slated to meet. The deadline for the proposed treaty is May 2024.
The Trump-Pence Administration had previously cut off American tax dollars to the WHO and formally withdrew from the organization in 2020. The AAF’s letter urges the US to withdraw from the WHO, arguing that it rejects American leadership in favor of the Chinese Communist Party’s quest for world domination.
The controversy surrounding the WHO and its proposed pandemic treaty is not new. Critics have accused the organization of being too close to China and of prioritizing political considerations over scientific ones. The AAF’s letter adds to the growing criticism of the WHO and its proposed treaty and raises serious questions about the role of international organizations in global health crises.
In conclusion, the controversy surrounding the WHO and its proposed pandemic treaty is a complex issue that raises serious questions about international cooperation, sovereignty, and democratic values. The AAF’s letter adds to the growing criticism of the WHO and its proposed treaty and urges the US to withdraw from the organization. The deadline for the proposed treaty is May 2024, and it remains to be seen how the international community will respond to these criticisms.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a significant issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It raises important questions about the role of international organizations in global health crises, the balance between sovereignty and international cooperation, and the importance of democratic values in times of crisis. The controversy is a reminder of the need for transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges.
The AAF’s letter is a call to action for the US and other countries to carefully consider the implications of the proposed pandemic treaty and to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises. It is a reminder that the health and well-being of people around the world depend on the ability of nations to work together while respecting their sovereignty and democratic values.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a significant issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the world.
The WHO pandemic treaty controversy is a complex issue that requires careful consideration and debate. It is a reminder of the importance of transparency, accountability, and scientific expertise in addressing global health challenges. It is a call to action for the international community to prioritize democratic values and sovereignty in their response to global health crises and to work together to ensure the health and well-being of people around the